This section contains questions asked in 2000. You can still post responses to these questions as noted below, they have been cut apart for efficiencies purposes only. Notice: This technical discussion forum has been established by the SRE to assist all reliability engineers, not just SRE members. To post your technical problem, solution, question, or answer here, send an e-mail to SRE webmaster. Your e-mail should follow the format of those already posted. Postings are accepted from anyone, as long as they relate to the reliability field. It works best if your posting contains contact information for possible follow-up. But, if necessary, postings can be anonymous - just so state in your email! Also, let us know when you do get workable solution or answer. We want to post it so everybody will benefit.
Problem/Question
(December 21, 2000):
Peter Ball
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(November 10, 2000):
Thank you very much and best regards.
Andrés García
Reply, June 15, 2005
Problem/Question
(November 3, 2000):
Kurt Wieneke
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (November 4, 2000): Kurt, I can't help you with who the custodian is or how to get a hard copy, but you can get a Portable Document Format (PDF) file copy from the SRE by "right clicking" on the following link: www.sre.org/pubs/Mil-Hdbk-781A.pdf. Note that the size of this PDF file is almost 28 megs!
Contact Name: Clarence Meese
Problem/Question
(November 2, 2000):
Rick Jones
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(October 26, 2000):
Michael Kogan
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(October 3, 2000):
Emilio Alberto
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (October 13, 2000): Emilio, I have three technical reports with that title written by the US Department of Defense. The one written in 1961 was sub-titled: "Mean Life Criterion" - 58 pages. I also have one from 1962 sub-titled: "Hazard Rate Criterion" - 86 pages and one from 1963 sub-titled: "Reliable Life Criterion" - 68 pages. What kind of information do you need? If you need a copy of any of these, e-mail me your shipping address and I'll send it (them) to you.
Contact Name: Clarence Meese
Problem/Question
(September 28, 2000):
Thank You
Ali Ashraf
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(September 22, 2000):
Leonardo Bangco
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(September 19, 2000):
Mark Bonthron
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (November 12, 2000): Triad Systems Corporation, Livermore, CA computes nonparametric estimates of age-specific field reliability and failure rate functions for most automotive parts, including electronics. These estimate are based on vehicle installed base and aftermarket sales, so they do NOT cover warranty ages. These estimates are used to make actuarial demand forecasts for auto parts and to recommend stock levels. Contact me for more information, or contact Dave Sheldon, VP, 3055 Triad Drive, Livermore, CA 94550-9559, 925-449-0606. His old email was des@triad.com. Company info is at www.cci-triad.com.
Contact Name: Larry George
Problem/Question
(August 31, 2000):
Regards,
Robert McEwen
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(August 21, 2000):
Brian Johnstone
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (April 19, 2002): Try the Univ College London, Defence Engrg Dept. They have some very good modules.
Contact Name: Ade Fadare
Problem/Question
(August 1, 2000):
Thanks,
Mike Varipatis
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(July 27, 2000):
Thanks
Jean-Marie CLOAREC
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(June 28, 2000):
Thank You
Contact: Sid Syed
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(June 22, 2000):
Contact: Anneka Beatty
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (July 10, 2000): Hi. We use ASENT at Raytheon/TI product. You can find them on the web. Other parts of our organizations in the UK use Item Software. Good Luck.
Contact Name: John S. Haluska
(July 26, 2000): I have been using Relex CAE software to do Bellcore Predictions and modeling. They can be found at www.relexsoftware.com. Be advised that this product is not without its problems. I used their latest release and ended up on the phone 2 or 3 times a day to their tech support because features didn't work the way the manual said they would. My current project lasted 3 months, largely because of software problems, but also poorly defined requirements that had nothing to do with the software. I have some concerns about the accuracy of reliability calculations, failure rate libraries, User library, RBD modeling, to name a few. My advice is get the demo, test drive it thoroughly, see if you can get what you need from that before putting any money down. Isograph UK, also makes a similar integrated software product, i.e., software that comes in a variety of bundles that ultimately form a complete RAM package, but can be purchased separately. I am in the process of comparing their latest beta version to the Relex v7.1. Their web page is www.isograph.com. Their USA office is in Southern California. Both companies offer Bellcore (Telcordia) Predictions, FMEA, Fault Tree and other RAM packages. I haven't got direct experience on this product yet, but I have met the software developers and can speak highly of them. I expect this product set to perform better than Relex because 1) they've been doing it longer, and 2) I like their professional attitude. Granted these are totally subjective remarks and your experience may differ. Both companies produce good products in a limited market. Since I am a Reliability Consultant I hold them both to a higher standard than most people might, but I fully expect to use the products everyday and have them perform flawlessly. Product number one isn't there yet.
Rob Poltz
Problem/Question
(June 21, 2000):
Thanks,
Contact: Hanan Hurwitz
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(May 30, 2000):
Contact: Stephen Ormon
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(May 29, 2000):
Electronic Controllers Signal Conditioners Electronic Indicators Electronic Recorders Control Valve Actuators Control Analyzers Chemistry pH Analyzers Thanks.
Contact: Hem Chaudhuri
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (September 13, 2000): Government and Industry run GIDEP is likely to provide necessary information regarding the MTBF, MTTR of the products of interest.
Contact Name: D.V.Petkar
Problem/Question
(May 19, 2000):
Contact: Leonardo Bangco
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (May 26, 2000): We use LTPD Tables (Lot Tolerance Percent Defective, aka Limiting Quality Level, LQL). The advantage of these tables over AQL or Zero Acceptance Tables is it allows you to have a failure and still pass the test. As a reliability engineer, having a failure is sometimes good in that it allows you to get a better grasp of the product limitations and facilitates continuous improvement. If you're familiar with Operating Characteristic Curves, this is the lower point on the graph, also termed Consumer's Risk and based on the Binomial Distribution. Glenn
Contact Name: Glenn Pelkey
(July 6, 2000): M. M. Desu and D. Raghavarao, "Sample Size Methodology," Academic Press, New York, 1990 P. Mace, "Sample Size Determination," Kreiger, Huntington, NY, 1974 The second book is excellent. For life testing, MIL-HDBK-781 (MIL-STD???) deals with exponential life testing, but products seldom have exponential lives.
Contact Name: Larry George
Problem/Question
(May 17, 2000):
Contact: Richard Vance
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (May 26, 2000): I haven't been able to find a way to create those types of graphs. There may be a commercial plug-in available somewhere, but I haven't found it with some searching on the web. Excel does have the Weibull 2 parameter and 3 parameter functions. However, you just have to live with a linear or logarithmic scale. Glenn
Contact Name: Glenn Pelkey
(November 29, 2000): Excel Weibull plots: It can be done - but it's a pain. Of course you can transform your cumulative failure data as Y = ln(ln(1/(1-F(t))), which gives it the right scale, and if you make the x axis ln(t) you then get a straight Weibull line at least... Now to get the right labels you'll need a little Excel treachery.
1. Erase the gridlines and all markers on the y-axis.
Does this make any sense? You have erased the y-axis and are making straight line functions that will appear on the graph and simulate the y-axis gridlines and labels.
5. Remove the markers of each new data series. Adjust colors and line
weights so the line looks like a gridline. I like to make my line for eta
F(t) = .632 dashed.
So, it works but it's obviously cumbersome. You can't rescale in the y-direction without adding or deleting data series. Good luck!
Contact Name: Richard Bourgeois
Problem/Question
(May 7, 2000):
Questions: What is the purpose and significance of powering up the units? How can one measure the impact?
Contact: Shirish Puranik
Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (June 7, 2000): The following was taken from IES publication "Environmental Stress Screening Guidelines for Assemblies": "Some factors involved in deciding whether or not to have the equipment operating are as follows:
Sincerely,
Contact Name: Jack Farrell
Problem/Question
(May 4, 2000):
Any ideas or hints are very welcome, thank you!
Contact: Eberhard Rompf
Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (May 14, 2000): A decreasing failure rate function in early life indicates "failure probabilities in the field due to quality problems in the production and assembly process." So estimate the failure rate function, preferably nonparametrically, because assuming a particular failure rate function (constant, Weibull) may hide a decreasing failure rate function in early life. There are several ways to estimate nonparametric failure rate functions. The alternatives depend on the kind of data you have. If you have ages-at-failures and survivors' ages, use the Kaplan-Meier estimator. If you have ships (sales, installations, etc.) and returns (complaints, repairs, failures, spares sales, etc.) , enter the data in members.home.net/pstlarry/Table.htm, and I'll send you back the failure rate function estimate along with a test for decreasing failure rate, free. Ships and returns data are required by generally accepted accounting principles, so you have them. You just have to dig up the data.
Contact Name: Larry George
Problem/Question
(April 30, 2000):
On Page 45 of this paper the symbol £ is used, but not shown in the Notation List on Page 44. I would be interested to know the meaning for this symbol and perhaps one of the Authors could explain. I presume that it is a Cost identifier, but in what context? Thanks.
Contact: Peter Ball
Company Name and Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(April 10, 2000):
Contact: Jennifer Zeagler
Company Name and Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (April 16, 2000): You can download Mil Specs in Adobe pdf format from:
Contact Name: Glenn Pelkey
Problem/Question
(April 4, 2000):
Thanks in advance.
Contact: Quynh Nguyen
Company Name and Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far:
(June 18, 2006) (April 5, 2000): Quynh, I think what you're trying to do is convert failure rate measures, FIT to MTBF. They are just the inverse of each other with a multiplier. FIT is failures per 10E9 hours (sometimes per 10E9 device-hours, but hour for simplicity). MTBF is hours per failure. So, for example 200 FIT is equivalent to 50,000,000 hrs MTBF. (200 divided by 10E9, then inversed).
Contact Name: Glenn Pelkey
(April 5, 2000): The relation between "Lamda "and "MTBF" is as follows: Lamda = 1/MTBF
Contact Name: Petkar Dattatraya Vishnu
Problem/Question
(March 31, 2000):
I am a petroleum engineer not particularly experienced within Reliability Engineering. However, I am working on a problem where I want to illustrate the reliability difference to two different oil well completion options. From literature I have figured out how to calculate parallell (F=sum of Fi) and serial reliabilities (R=sum of Ri) of a system. However, a slightly more complex situation is too difficult for me (this situation is also illustrated on pp 35 in Cox & Tait; Safety, Reliability and Risk Management). Thanks and best regards
Contact: Lasse Hermansson
Company Name and Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (April 18, 2000): For complex functional or reliability block diagrams, elements used in hot or cold standby, star/ delta and lattice conversion math etc. I can thoroughly recommend MIL-HDBK-338. It is two parts, each of about 1500 pages, so I doubt if it's available off the net. The document is very well organized and covers both reliability and maintainability: it constitutes the "ten commandments" from which have been derived most of the MIL-STD-7xx reliability and MIL-STD-4xx maintainability specifications. Despite its thickness, it is not in the least intimidating and is a very readable reference. I used it frequently on a $9 x 10*9 naval frigate replacement program, but it is equally applicable to a non-military RAMS environment. I don't know how you can get a copy; probably your best bet is to start by contacting the Rome Air Development Center (RADC). Good luck.
Contact Name: John Conrad
(July 13, 2000): Try the Rome Air Development Center (RADC). This agency is not in Rome, Italy but in New York State (Grifiss Air Force Base) USA. Unfortunately, I do not have their web address; however, any search engine will get you in the area. Good luck.
Contact Name: Vin Casale
Company Name and Address:
Problem/Question
Problem/Question
(March 31, 2000):
Contact: Gianluca Luoni E-mail: cst@cstitalia.it Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(March 31, 2000):
I need failure rates and modes data on solid state Tm:LuAG lasers and related systems devices, i.e., mirrors, prisms, Q-switches, laser pumps. My need is immediate. Does anyone have data or know where I might find it?
Contact: Robert Poltz
Phone: 831-420-1388
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (July 27, 2000): I've seen your question, and I've the same problem. I'm searching reliability data about optical components: lens, miror, etc. If you get an answer, could you help me by sending them? Kinds Regards
Jean-Marie CLOAREC
Problem/Question
(March 8, 2000):
Contact: Laurence Thayer
Company Name and Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(March 5, 2000):
Contact: Narendra Patrabansh
Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help? The discussion thus far: (March 23, 2000): Narendra Patrabansh, Please review our program in Reliability Engineering at: www.enre.umd.edu. If I can then help you with specific items not on the website, please feel free to contact me.
Contact Name: Marvin Roush
(March 23, 2000): Dear Narendra, I know that the University of Arizona and the University of Maryland, in the US, have programs for advanced studies in Reliability Engineering. You'll find more information on the SRE web page, as of November 19, 1999. You could have more information at: rac.iitri.org. We have a research group at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, who focuses on reliability of power system. Their url is: www.engr.usask.ca/~billinto. Moreover, Prof. Dhillon, at the University of Ottawa, is also active in the reliability field. The url is: www.uottawa.ca. He is in the department of Mechanical Engineering. I know that there is a lot of research groups active in this field in Europe, such as SINTEF in Norway and ISDF (Institut de Surete de Fonctionnement) in France. Search for those names on Internet and you'll probably find them. Remember that very often, reliability engineering courses are taught in industrial engineering programs. You could check this also. Good luck,
Contact Name: Michel Demers, P.Eng., M.Sc.A
Problem/Question
(March 5, 2000):
Contact: Ajay Likhite
Company Name and Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Problem/Question
(January 11, 2000):
Regards,
Contact: Joseph A. Russo
Company Name and Address:
Solution/Answer: Can you help?
Go to 2001 Technical Help. Go to 1999 Technical Help. Go to 1998 Technical Help.
| |||||||